Origen on the Penitent
Thief
quem
non gravi solvit metu
latrónis
absolútio?
The Paschal hymn Hic est dies verus Dei centers our attention on the penitent thief
as a sign of both the power of Christ’s death and of his resurrection:
quem non gravi solvit metu
latrónis absolútio?
Opus stupent et ángeli,
pœnam vidéntes córporis
Christóque adhæréntem reum
vitam beátam cárpere
Quid hoc potest sublímius,
ut culpa quærat grátiam,
metúmque solvat cáritas
reddátque mors vitam
novam?
Steven Cartwright’s essay ‘Origen’s Interpretation of Romans’ in A Companion to St. Paul in the Middle Ages
(Series Brill's
Companions to the Christian Tradition, Volume: 39 Editor: Steven Cartwright) explains the hymn’s interest in the thief. This text was well-known in
the Middle Ages and well-respected and as we would expect, much disliked by
Luther.
In his Commentary
on Romans Origen looks for examples of justification by grace alone and finds
two: the sinful woman in Luke 7 and the good thief in Luke 23:42. Origen comments:
In the Gospels nothing else is
recorded about his good works, but for the sake of
this faith alone, Jesus said to him:
‘truly I say to you: today you will be with me
in paradise. . . . through faith
this thief was justified without works of the law.
Origen views this
as an exception to the rule, because the thief had no time to perform good
works. But, while Scripture sometimes describes sinners who are justified by
faith alone, normally after receiving baptismal grace, good works and merit are
necessary.
“Interestingly
Origen chooses to exemplify the necessity of mortification by returning to the
example of the thief on the cross. . . he had been planted together in the
likeness of Christ’s death and of his resurrection, and for that reason
deserved paradise since he had been joined to the tree of life.”
The thief was ‘a
plant worthy of paradise which was joined to the tree of life’. The thief is an example of
how faith and works cooperate.
No comments:
Post a Comment